Per-Task, Per-Outcome, Per-Seat: A Field Guide to the GaaS Pricing Taxonomy
Agentic AI-as-a-Service (GaaS) vendors are quietly running one of the most chaotic pricing experiments software has seen in a decade. Three
10 articles tagged "gaas pricing models".
Agentic AI-as-a-Service (GaaS) vendors are quietly running one of the most chaotic pricing experiments software has seen in a decade. Three
When an AI agent does the work a person used to do, the temptation is obvious: price against the salary. Capture a slice of the $70,000 you
Metered pricing for agentic AI feels fair on paper: you pay for what you use. But the model contains a hidden asymmetry. Sophisticated power
"Unlimited" in agent-as-a-service is a marketing word, not an economic one. Behind every flat-rate "unlimited agent" plan sits a vendor quie
Intercom set off the most-watched pricing experiment in the agent economy when it priced Fin at $0.99 per resolution instead of per seat or
The per-seat pricing model that built the $300B SaaS industry assumes a roughly fixed ratio of humans to software. Agentic AI breaks that as
Most agentic AI products price on volume, tasks, tokens, seats, outcomes. A smaller, sharper group prices on *autonomy*: how much rope the
Outcome-based pricing sounds clean, you pay only when the agent delivers, but the whole model lives or dies on two unglamorous questions: who
When an AI agent reads a Salesforce record, drafts an email in Gmail, updates a row in NetSuite, and posts a Slack message to close the loop
Outcome-based pricing sounds like the great equalizer of the agent economy: you only pay when the agent delivers. But the model rewards whoe